SYK Publishing

SYK Publishing · The rooms · Western Philosophy

Western Philosophy

The Western Hall

Minds that looked into the mind

Enter the hall ↓
Before we begin

Is it philosophy, or is it psychology? The question is younger than it looks. The word psychology comes from the Greek psyche, the soul or mind, and the first great book on the subject, Aristotle's On the Soul, was written by a philosopher. For most of history, anyone who turned the mind over carefully to understand how people think, want, fear and choose was doing both at once.

The labels came later, and like the word Dao, they never quite cover the whole thing. That is why the people in this hall belong here. A Florentine diplomat who read the hearts of princes. A grumpy German who found a blind, hungry force underneath all our reasons. His rebellious admirer, who called himself a psychologist and tore up the moral map. Each of them looked hard into the human mind, and each found something we still recognise.

There is something else you will notice as you walk through. Strip away the language, and these thinkers keep arriving at the same places the sages of China and India reached long before. The words are different. The pointing finger is different. The moon looks very much the same.

Room I · the Hermetica, c. 100 to 300 CE

The Thrice-Great

Hermes Trismegistus

Said to be a wise teacher of ancient Egypt, "thrice-great", the meeting of the Greek god Hermes and the Egyptian Thoth. To him were credited the Hermetica, writings on mind, creation and the soul, which taught that a human being can know the divine because the mind itself is divine. In 1463 Marsilio Ficino translated them into Latin for Cosimo de' Medici, who told him to put aside his translation of Plato and do Hermes first. The Renaissance fell in love with them.

In 1614 the scholar Isaac Casaubon showed from their Greek that they were written in the early centuries after Christ, not in the age of Moses as many believed. But the questions they ask are older than any date. Shifu is preparing this room.

This room is being prepared by Shifu. Come back soon.

Room II · 1469 to 1527

The Reader of Princes

Niccolò Machiavelli

In 1513 Niccolò Machiavelli had lost everything. For fourteen years he had been a senior official of the Florentine Republic, a diplomat who met kings, popes and the ruthless Cesare Borgia face to face. Then the Medici family returned to power. He was dismissed, accused of plotting against them, imprisoned and tortured, and finally released to a small farm outside Florence.

There he wrote a famous letter to a friend. By day he caught thrushes, chatted with woodcutters and played cards in the local inn. But in the evening, he said, he took off his muddy clothes, put on courtly robes, and entered his study to "converse with the ancients", the great historians and statesmen of Rome, asking them why they had acted as they did. Out of those conversations came a short book: The Prince.

It shocked people then, and it still does, because it describes how power actually works rather than how it ought to. A ruler, Machiavelli says, must sometimes be a lion, to frighten off wolves, and sometimes a fox, to see through traps. He must understand fortune, which he compares to a flooding river: you cannot stop it, but you can build dykes and banks in calm weather. And he must have virtù, not virtue in our sense, but energy, skill and nerve.

As the physicians say it happens in hectic fever, that in the beginning of the malady it is easy to cure but difficult to detect, but in the course of time, not having been either detected or treated in the beginning, it becomes easy to detect but difficult to cure.

The Prince, chapter 3, tr. W. K. Marriott

His most famous question is whether it is better to be loved or feared. His answer is more careful than people remember: it is best to be both, but since that is hard, if you must choose, it is safer to be feared. Then he adds a warning that is often forgotten: never be hated.

Machiavelli was, at heart, a psychologist of power. He watched how people respond to hope, fear, gratitude and injury. He noticed that small injuries make people want revenge, so that harm, if it must be done, should be done once and finished. Shifu has traced that same cold logic far from any palace, in the way organised crime controls the young people it uses.

Step through the doorMugged Off in Organised CrimeMachiavelli's logic on the street →
Room III · 1788 to 1860

The Philosopher of the Will

Arthur Schopenhauer

Arthur Schopenhauer was born in Danzig in 1788, the son of a rich merchant who wanted him to go into business. When his father died, probably by suicide, Arthur left the counting house for philosophy. His mother, Johanna, became a successful novelist with a glittering salon in Weimar, where Goethe was a regular. Mother and son quarrelled bitterly and did not see each other for the last twenty-four years of her life.

At thirty he published his great work, The World as Will and Representation. Almost nobody bought it. He became a lecturer in Berlin and, with breathtaking confidence, scheduled his lectures at exactly the same hour as those of Hegel, the most famous philosopher in Germany. Hegel's hall was packed. Schopenhauer's was nearly empty, and after one term the course was dropped.

His central idea is unsettling. Behind the world we see, and behind every reason we give for what we do, is something blind and restless he called the Will: a hungry striving that drives the plant towards light, the animal towards food and mate, and us towards our endless wants. We think we choose our desires. Mostly, Schopenhauer says, our desires choose us, and our intellect invents good reasons afterwards.

A number of porcupines huddled together for warmth on a cold day in winter; but, as they began to prick one another with their quills, they were obliged to disperse.

Parerga and Paralipomena (Studies in Pessimism), tr. T. Bailey Saunders

That is why he is famous as a pessimist. Wanting is painful; getting brings only a moment of relief before boredom and the next want arrive. Life, he wrote, swings like a pendulum between pain and boredom.

But he also offered three ways out. Art, and above all music, lets us forget the Will for a while and simply see. Compassion, which he made the foundation of all morality, comes from recognising that the suffering in another is the same suffering as in yourself; at bottom, we are not separate. And the quiet letting go of the saints and ascetics, which he admired in Christian mystics, in Hinduism and in Buddhism alike.

Fame came at last in his sixties, through a collection of essays. He spent his final years in Frankfurt, walking his poodle every afternoon, a celebrity at the dinner table of the Englischer Hof. His ideas went on to shape Wagner, Tolstoy, Freud's thinking about the unconscious, Einstein and Wittgenstein.

Step through the doorThe Ocean and the WaveThe Upanishads Schopenhauer loved →
Room III continued

Master and Rebel

Schopenhauer and Nietzsche looked at the same thing, the endless striving of life with all its pain, and gave opposite answers. What should we do with suffering?

S

Schopenhauer

1788 to 1860

“Quiet the Will”

Every want is a small pain, and every satisfaction is brief. Chasing more will never set you free. See through the striving instead.

Find rest in music and art, where the Will falls silent for a while. Feel compassion, because the suffering in others is your own suffering wearing a different face. And, like the saints of East and West, learn to want less.

N

Nietzsche

1844 to 1900

“Say yes to life”

Suffering is not an argument against life. It is part of the price of anything great. The tree that grows tallest has the deepest roots, reaching down into the dark.

Do not run from the striving; shape it. Overcome yourself, become who you are, and love your fate so fully that you would live it all again.

Perhaps both are right at different times of a life. Laozi would say the water does not choose between yielding and overcoming; it does both. And Yogananda would point out that the wave can rise high and still know it is the ocean.

Room IV · 1821 to 1881

The Underground Man

Fyodor Dostoevsky

On 22 December 1849 a young Russian writer stood in the snow of Semyonovsky Square in St Petersburg, waiting his turn as the first three prisoners were tied to posts before a firing squad. At the last moment a messenger arrived: the Tsar had commuted the sentence. It had been staged all along. Dostoevsky spent the next four years in a Siberian prison camp, and came back with the material for some of the deepest novels ever written about guilt, freedom, faith and the human heart, ending with The Brothers Karamazov in 1880.

Freud called The Brothers Karamazov the most magnificent novel ever written. Nietzsche discovered him in 1887 and a year later called Dostoevsky the only psychologist from whom he had anything to learn. Shifu is preparing this room.

This room is being prepared by Shifu. Come back soon.

Room V · 1844 to 1900

The Hammer and the Dance

Friedrich Nietzsche

In 1865 a twenty-one-year-old student in Leipzig picked up a second-hand book in a shop, took it home, threw himself on the sofa and read it for days. It was Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation. Friedrich Nietzsche had found his first great teacher.

He was brilliant. At twenty-four he became a professor at the University of Basel, before he had even finished his doctorate. He became a close friend of the composer Richard Wagner. Then, one after another, he broke with them: with Wagner and with Schopenhauer himself, and then with the university. Plagued by migraines and failing eyesight, he resigned in 1879 and spent ten years wandering between boarding houses in Switzerland and Italy, writing book after book that almost nobody read.

Schopenhauer had looked at the endless striving of life and said: this is suffering, let it go. Nietzsche looked at the same striving and said: this is life, say yes to it. He called it the will to power, not power over others so much as the drive in every living thing to grow, to overcome, to become more than it was. The highest form of it is self-overcoming.

He was a fierce critic of morality, by which he meant the unexamined values we inherit. Where did "good" and "evil" come from, he asked, and whose interests did they serve? He insisted that every view is seen from somewhere: there is no view from nowhere, only perspectives. And he noticed how often people hide behind masks, even from themselves.

God is dead! God remains dead! And we have killed him!

The Gay Science (The Joyful Wisdom), section 125, tr. Thomas Common

His most famous line, "God is dead", is spoken in his book The Gay Science by a madman who runs into the marketplace in broad daylight carrying a lantern. It is not a cheer. It is a cry of alarm: if the old foundations are gone, what will hold our values up now?

His answer was a thought experiment. Imagine a demon tells you that you must live your life again, exactly as it is, every pain and every joy, over and over for ever. Would you curse him? Or could you love your life so much that you would say: Once more? That is the eternal recurrence, and Nietzsche's ideal was amor fati: love of one's fate.

In January 1889, in Turin, he collapsed. The story goes that he had flung his arms around the neck of a horse being whipped in the street. He never recovered, and spent his last eleven years in the care of his mother and his sister, who later edited his notes into a book and twisted his ideas to fit her own antisemitic views. Nietzsche, who had despised antisemitism, died in 1900, just as the world began to read him.

Step through the doorThe Great PretenderA novel about the masks we are given →Step through the doorFinger To The MoonSeeing for yourself →
A short stop in the hall

Did they really say that?

Famous lines, often shared, sometimes wrong. Tap each one to find out.

"The ends justify the means."MachiavelliReal or fake?
Never wrote it

Those words are not in The Prince. The nearest is a remark in chapter 18 that people judge the actions of princes by how they turn out. It is an observation about how the world works, not a slogan.

"It is better to be feared than loved."MachiavelliReal or fake?
Only half of it

He said it is best to be both loved and feared; only if you cannot be both is it safer to be feared. And he added that a ruler must above all avoid being hated.

"All truth passes through three stages: first it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, third it is accepted as self-evident."SchopenhauerReal or fake?
Not found in his works

This is quoted everywhere with his name on it, but no one has found it in anything he wrote. He did say something gentler, that truth is allowed only a brief victory between being condemned as paradox and dismissed as trivial.

"Talent hits a target no one else can hit; genius hits a target no one else can see."SchopenhauerReal or fake?
Really his

This one is genuine, from the chapter on genius in the second volume of The World as Will and Representation, though English translations word it in different ways.

"What does not kill me makes me stronger."NietzscheReal or fake?
Really his

Genuine, from the maxims at the start of Twilight of the Idols (1888). He wrote it in the first person, about himself, a man who had lived for years with poor health. It is a personal vow, not a promise that all suffering is good for us.

"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."NietzscheReal or fake?
Never wrote it

A lovely line, and it is on countless posters with his name, but it is not in any of his books. He did write, in Twilight of the Idols, that without music life would be a mistake.

Leaving the hall

Led by the blind

Here is something curious. The Katha Upanishad warns of people "wise in their own conceit", wandering "like blind men led by the blind". Jesus said the same: if the blind lead the blind, both fall into the ditch. Plato pictured prisoners in a cave, mistaking shadows on the wall for the real world because that is all anyone has shown them.

India, Galilee and Athens, in three different languages, found the same danger: taking our understanding second-hand. Every thinker in this hall was, in his own way, trying to see for himself, and asking us to do the same.

So read them. Not the summaries, not the quotes on posters, and not only this page. Read the books, slowly, and see what you find. It may not be what anyone else found. It will be yours.

Where to go next

First steps

  • The Prince Machiavelli; short, clear and still startling
  • Essays and Aphorisms Schopenhauer at his most readable
  • The Gay Science Nietzsche's most joyful book, with the madman and the demon

Going deeper

  • Discourses on Livy Machiavelli the republican
  • The World as Will and Representation Schopenhauer's great work
  • Beyond Good and Evil Nietzsche on perspectives, masks and morality
  • The Brothers Karamazov Dostoevsky, for when the room opens

Free to read

  • Project Gutenberg W. K. Marriott's Prince, T. Bailey Saunders's Schopenhauer essays and the early English Nietzsche translations are in the public domain

Walk on from here